Author:
English Burton C.,Mahajanashetti S.B.,Roberts Roland K.
Abstract
AbstractFarmers are interested in knowing whether applying inputs at variable rates across a field is economically viable. The answer depends on the crop, the input, their prices, the cost of variable rate technology (VRT) versus uniform rate technology (URT), and the spatial and yield response variability within each field. Methods were investigated for determining the range of spatial variability over which the return to VRT covers its additional cost compared with URT in fields with multiple management zones. Models developed in this article, or variants thereof, could be used to help farmers make the VRT adoption decision.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference44 articles.
1. Economic and Environmental Feasibility of Variable Rate Nitrogen Fertilizer Applications with Carry-Over Effects;Watkins;Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics,1998
2. A comparison of crop production functions using simulated data for irrigated corn in western Kansas
3. An Alternative Rationale for Corn Nitrogen Fertilizer Recommendations
4. Moving from Uniform to Variable Fertilizer Rates on Iowa Corn: Effects on Rates and Returns;Babcock;Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics,1998
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献