Author:
Epplin Francis M.,Haque Mohua
Abstract
First-generation grain ethanol biofuel has affected the historical excess capacity problem in U.S. agriculture. Second-generation cellulosic ethanol biofuel has had difficulty achieving cost-competitiveness. Third-generation drop-in biofuels are under development. If lignocellulosic biomass from perennial grasses becomes the feedstock of choice for second- and third-generation biorefineries, an integrated system could evolve in which a biorefinery directly manages feedstock production, harvest, storage, and delivery. Modeling was conducted to determine the potential economic benefits from an integrated system. Relatively low-cost public policies that could be implemented to facilitate economic efficiency are proposed.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference63 articles.
1. Techno-economic analysis of biomass fast pyrolysis to transportation fuels
2. Should We Invest in Biofuels?
3. Switchgrass Biomass Production in the Midwest USA
4. Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: July 20, 2011 Renewable Fuel Standards.;Federal Register,2010
5. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Renewable Fuel Standard Program (RFS2) Regulatory Impact Analysis. 2010. Internet site: http://nepis.epa.gov/Adobe/PDF/P1006DXP.PDF (Accessed April 2010).
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献