Involuntary status and mental capacity for treatment decisions under Sections 4, 3, and 57 of Ireland’s Mental Health Act, 2001: analysis and recommendations for reform

Author:

Reidy Katherine,Kelly Brendan D.ORCID

Abstract

Although significant progress has been made in Irish mental health law in recent decades, the Mental Health Act, 2001 still falls short of properly protecting human rights. A consideration of human rights developments, both domestically and internationally, highlights the urgent need for reform. In this paper we consider Sections 4 (‘Best interests’), 3 (‘Mental disorder’) and 57 (‘Treatment not requiring consent’) of the 2001 Act and related recommendations in the 2015 Report of the Expert Group on the Review of the Mental Health Act, 2001, and suggest specific areas for reform. Just as medicine evolves over time, so too does our understanding of human rights and law. While embracing a human rights-based approach to the extent suggested here might be seen as aspirational, it is important to balance achievable goals with higher ideals if progress is to be made and rights are to be respected.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,Psychiatry and Mental health,Applied Psychology

Reference13 articles.

1. Carolan, M (2020). Judge orders Gardaí be given material on ‘traumatised, dangerous’ woman. Irish Times, 18 September. (https://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/courts/high-court/judge-orders-garda%C3%AD-be-given-material-on-traumatised-dangerous-woman-1.4358401). Accessed 28 September 2020.

2. Expert Group on the Review of the Mental Health Act, 2001 (2015). Report of the Expert Group on the Review of the Mental Health Act, 2001. Department of Health: Dublin. (https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/637ccf-report-of-the-expert-group-review-of-the-mental-health-act-2001/). Accessed 28 September 2020.

3. Dignity, human rights and the limits of mental health legislation

4. The Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act 2015: what it is and why it matters

5. Koffeman, NR (2010). (The Right to) Personal Autonomy in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights. Leiden University: Leiden. (https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/15890/N.R.+Koffeman+-+(The+right)+to+personal+autonomy+in+the+case+law+of+the+ECtHR+(2010).pdf;jsessionid=EE037547A594FEE204FC359ADE188458?sequence=3). Accessed 28 September 2020.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3