Abstract
AbstractThis paper discusses how we are to understand claims to the effect that something is good relative to a person. It is argued that goodness relative to should not be equated with good for as the latter is a relational value notion and the former is a value theoretical notion. It is argued further that good relative to a person should be understood as good from the perspective or the point of view of the person. But this analysis of the notion ‘good relative to’ leaves open questions about the full nature of relative goodness. For that, a positive proposal about what it is for something to be good relative to a person's point of view is needed. One such proposal is put forward on which the relevant perspective is determined or fixed in terms of the pro and con attitudes of the individual person.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference6 articles.
1. Objectivism and Relational Good;Rosati;Social Philosophy and Policy Foundation,2008
2. Value Based on Preferences
3. Normativity and Projection in Hobbes's Leviathan
4. Utilitarian Deontologies?: On Preference Utilitarianism and Agent-Relative Value;Bykvist;Theoria,1996
5. Good and Good for
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献