Abstract
McTaggart's famous argument that the A-series is contradictory is vitiated by an unsatisfactory conceptualization of tenses which can be corrected by making explicit their relational structure. This leads into a much sharper formulation of his apparent contradiction, and defusing this apparent contradiction requires a careful distinction between tensed and tenseless descriptions of thoughts. As a result the ‘unreality’ of tense turns out to rest on the fact that tensed descriptions of temporal facts do not capture their identity. This ‘metaphysical’ priority of tenseless over tensed descriptions of time is, however, counterbalanced by an ‘epistemological’ priority of tensed thoughts over tenseless thoughts: a conception of tense which requires a form of self-consciousness turns out to be an essential ingredient of rational thought.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The Death of the Emperor’s Mind from an Eternalist Perspective;Artificial Intelligence Versus Natural Intelligence;2022
2. Time and Truth: The Presentism-Eternalism Debate;Philosophy;2009-04
3. Preface;Modality and Tense;2005-07-14
4. Origin of the Papers;Modality and Tense;2005-07-14
5. Copyright Page;Modality and Tense;2005-07-14