1. Bernard , De gradibus humilitatis 4. 14 (PL 182. 9490; Leclercq 3. 27. 16–18): ‘Et legibus humanis statutum, et in causis, tam ecclesiasticis quam saecularibus servatum scio, speciales amicos causantium non debere admitti ad judicium, ne vel fallant vel fallantur amore suorum.’
2. It is interesting also to contrast Bernard's approach to the direct statements made by Hugh of Victor S. who made the thesis of spiritual dominion over the temporal world abundantly clear: Hugh of St. Victor, De sacramentis 2. 2 (PL 176.148): ‘Nam spiritualis potestas terrenam potestatem et instituere habet, ut sit, et judicare habet si bona non fuerit. Ipsa vero a Deo primum instituta est, et cum deviat, a solo Deo judicari potest … . Quod autem spiritualis potestas… et prior sit tempore; et major dignitate… primum a Deo sacerdotium institutum est; postea vero per sacerdotium (jubente Deo) regalis potestas ordinata.’ This assertion is explicitly denied by Bernard , Consid. 2. 6; see above n. 102.
3. Jordan , op. cit. (n. 55 above) 293, n. 1.
4. Jordan , op. cit. (n. 55 above) 312–13.
5. Bernard , Consid. 4. 5 (PL 182. 776; Leclercq 3. 459–461).