1. This can be seen at a glance from the tabulation of all conditions in the manumissions by Hermann (n. 12) 40–49. However, disregard his chronology, supra, n. 24.
2. P Lond.i.19 (= UPZ i.38) 18 = P Lond.33 (= UPZ i.39) 15 = P Par.33 (= UPZ i.40) 11 is definitely excluded; it is not optative, but infinitive, as Mayser says, op. cit. II, 2, 293. On the other hand, BGU iv.1187.24 may belong here and makes the possible twelfth Ptolemaic optative protasis. The editors date it s. i a. C.; Mayser, II, 3, 91, puts in 5 B. C.—though on what information I've been unable to discover. However, I've followed him and classified it with the post-Ptolemaic, infra, at n. 43.
3. Schmid, Atticismus (n. 5) IV, 607
4. The following enumeration is complete to 400 A. D., positis ponendis; cf. supra, n. 34. Horn (n. 11) 64 cites BGU iii.811.7f., but the condition is eliminated by the correction in the same volume. Berichtigungsl. I, 168 reads the indicative in PGen.79.10. BGU i.326. ii. 9 and PLips.50.14 are editorial restoration.
5. Op. cit. (n. 10) 57