Clinical stakeholder preferences for paediatric cardiac surgery outcome reporting in Australia and New Zealand

Abstract

AbstractBackground:Outcome reporting is an essential element of quality assurance. Evaluation of the information needs of stakeholders of outcome reporting is limited. This study aimed to examine stakeholder preferences for the content, format, and dissemination of paediatric cardiac surgery performance data in Australia and New Zealand.Methods:Semi-structured interviews were completed with a purposive sample of Queensland stakeholders to evaluate their attitudes and expectations regarding reporting of paediatric cardiac surgery outcomes. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Two researchers used an interpretive description approach to analyse the transcripts qualitatively.Results:Nineteen stakeholders were interviewed including fifteen clinicians, four parents, one hospital administrator, and one consumer advocate were interviewed. Mortality was highlighted as the area of greatest interest in reports by clinical and consumer groups. The majority preferred hospital rather than individual/clinician-level reporting. Annual reports were preferred by clinicians who requested reports be distributed electronically.Conclusions:The evidence generated from outcome reporting in paediatric cardiac surgery is highly desired by clinicians, administrators, parents, families, and advocacy groups. Clinical users prefer information to assist in clinical decision-making, while families seek personalised information at crucial time points in their clinical journey.