Abstract
AbstractLegal scholars rely heavily on vocabularies of ‘actors’, ‘agents’, and ‘experts’ to account for the fact that law does not develop by itself. However, the identities, idiosyncrasies, and individual professional contributions of law'speopleare rarely illuminated. This article suggests that the relative absence of people in transnational legal scholarship helps to explain some of its gaps. The task of bringing ‘human actors back on stage’ creates some new opportunities for transnational environmental law scholarship. It invites attention to both dominant and excluded voices. It offers a way of bridging the gap between the bureaucratic language of law and its lived reality. It also provides an understanding of why, despite ferocious attempts to roll back the advances of environmental law in some places, many scholars and practitioners find reason to be optimistic about the future of environmental law.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Universal, Pluriversal, and in Between;Sustainable Development, International Law, and a Turn to African Legal Cosmologies;2024-05-23
2. Problematising the Normative Trajectory of Sustainable Development in Africa;Sustainable Development, International Law, and a Turn to African Legal Cosmologies;2024-05-23
3. The Rise, Fall, and Rise Again of Sustainable Development;Sustainable Development, International Law, and a Turn to African Legal Cosmologies;2024-05-23
4. Mise en Scène;Sustainable Development, International Law, and a Turn to African Legal Cosmologies;2024-05-23
5. Leveraging Environmental Data for Intelligent Traffic Forecasting in Smart Cities;Communications in Computer and Information Science;2024