Abstract
AbstractIt is sometimes assumed that, in order for animals to be adequately protected by the legal system, their status first needs to change from property to person in one fell swoop. Legal personhood is perceived as the necessary requirement for animals to possess legal rights and become visible in law, distinguished from legal things. In this article I propose an alternative approach to animal legal personhood, which construes the road towards it as a gradual transition rather than a revolution. According to this alternative approach, animals become increasingly visible in law when their existing simple rights are shaped to function more like the rights of humans. Instead of a condition for the possession of rights, legal personhood should then be regarded as a (potential) consequence of growing animal rights.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Reference24 articles.
1. Should Chimpanzees Have Standing? The Case for Pursuing Legal Personhood for Non-Human Animals
2. Cognitively Impaired Humans, Intelligent Animals, and Legal Personhood;Cupp;Florida Law Review,2017
3. Is there a need for a new, an ecological, understanding of legal animal rights?
4. Living Property: A New Status for Animals within the Legal System;Favre;Marquette Law Review,2010
5. Toward a Non-Property Status for Animals;Kelch;New York University Environmental Law Journal,1998
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献