Abstract
ArgumentThis article is the sequel to an article published in the previous issue ofScience in Contextthat dealt with homeomeric lines (Acerbi 2010). The present article deals with foundational issues in Greek mathematics. It considers two key characters in the study of mathematical homeomery, namely, Apollonius and Geminus, and analyzes in detail their approaches to foundational themes as they are attested in ancient sources. The main historiographical result of this paper is to show thatthere wasa well-establishedmathematicalfield of discourse in “foundations of mathematics,” a fact that is by no means obvious. The paper argues that the authors involved in this field of discourse set up a variety of philosophical, scholarly, and mathematical tools that they used in developing their investigations.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,General Social Sciences
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Copernicus and Axiomatics;Handbook of the History and Philosophy of Mathematical Practice;2024
2. Euclid’s Fourth Postulate: Its authenticity and significance for the foundations of Greek mathematics;Science in Context;2023-12-07
3. The Menaechmi;Apeiron;2023-03-24
4. Copernicus and Axiomatics;Handbook of the History and Philosophy of Mathematical Practice;2022-12-20
5. Two ancient classifications of sciences: Aristotle and Geminus;ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition;2021