Abstract
The ArgumentThe group of mathematicians known as Bourbaki persuasively proclaimed the isolation of its field of research — pure mathematics — from society and science. It may therefore seem paradoxical that links with larger French cultural movements, especially structuralism and potential literature, are easy to establish. Rather than arguing that the latter were a consequence of the former, which they were not, I show that all of these cultural movements, including the Bourbakist endeavor, emerged together, each strengthening the public appeal of the others through constant, albeit often superficial, interaction. This codependency is partly responsible for their success and moreover accounts for their simultaneous fall from favor, which, however, can clearly be seen as also stemming from different internal problems. To understand this dynamics, I argue that Bourbaki's role can best be captured by using the notion ofcultural connector, which I introduce here.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,General Social Sciences
Reference164 articles.
1. Mathématiques et axiomatique, qu'apporte de nouveau Bourbaki?;Zisman;La Pensée: Revue du rationalisme moderne,1956
2. Growing Explanations
3. Work and Waste: Political Economy and Natural Philosophy in Nineteenth-Century Britain (1–3);Norton;History of Science,1989
4. The Pure and the Applied: Bourbakism Comes to Mathematical Economics
Cited by
51 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献