Abstract
The question under discussion here is both perplexing and easy, a paradox arising from the scarcity of precisely datable Sung bronzes. Because of the scarcity of such bronzes, art historians have not succeeded in forming a definite view about their quality, casting, and designs; however, it may be possible for specialists in other fields to say something about them. Unfortunately, records, too, are scanty. Under such circumstances, we may be justified in resorting to exogenous, namely economic, factors in the hope of finding an acceptable provisional conclusion.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference4 articles.
1. An early mediaeval Chinese alchemical text on aqueous solutions;Needham;Ambix,1959
2. The economic background of the Huich'ang suppression of Buddhism;Ch'en;HJAS,1956
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Cauldron, Copper, Cash: Medieval Bronze in Motion and Flux;Journal of Chinese Literature and Culture;2024-04-01
2. Fungible Things: Economies of Desire in the (De)formation of Chinese Bronzes;West 86th: A Journal of Decorative Arts, Design History, and Material Culture;2021-09-01
3. Alerting the Masses;Monumenta Serica;2019-07-03
4. Bibliography;The Cambridge History of China;2015-02-28
5. Therise of theTao-hsüehConfucian fellowship in Southern Sung;The Cambridge History of China;2015-02-28