Abstract
In 1937, Burma formally separated from India. The separation might seem self-evident, given India and Burma's framing as distinct, bounded spaces. Yet, in the Patkai mountains straddling them, separation was a complex process with only a murky sense of finality, more problematic and contested than generally acknowledged. The border ran through similar groups and complex networks, which posed recurring problems for local inhabitants and frontier officials. As independence neared, colonial officials unsuccessfully tried to reshape the Patkai's territorialization. Viewed from the Patkai, the narrative of an amiable divorce between two ill-suited partners crumbles. The separation was one of several partitions that created bounded spaces across South Asia during the twentieth century. Seeing Burma and India as distinct others privileges spatio-cultural hierarchies rooted in colonial frameworks, assimilated by postcolonial political arrangements and nation-state-centric scholarship. This article foregrounds the need to explore how India and Burma were made against one another and recover alternative spatialities.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference119 articles.
1. [MNA] Myanmar National Archives. 1947b. Home Affairs Files 10_1. Formation of a Naga State when the British administration ceases. Accession number 712.
2. Amrita Bazaar Patrika (ABP). 1945. ‘Preposterous Scheme’, 27 March.
3. [MNA] Myanmar National Archives. 1944b. Home Affairs Files 10_1. Meeting minutes on Scheduled Areas affairs and Lt. Col. Naylor's papers. Accession number 167.
4. [NAI] National Archives of India. 1948. External Affairs Proceedings. Proposed delimitation of the undemarcated boundary between Burma and Assam in the Naga areas. 15(7)-NEF/48.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献