Abstract
The developmentally disabled, specifically those mentally incompetent from birth, are entitled to a full panoply of constitutional rights and protections. These rights include the right to terminate life-sustaining treatment, the right of procreative integrity and the right not to be involuntarily institutionalized. However, the mentally incompetent developmentally disabled are generally unable to exercise these rights. This Note asserts first that proper procedural safeguards are necessary to guarantee the exercise of these constitutional rights by the incompetent disabled individual. Second, the Note focuses upon how best to preserve the disabled person's autonomy. The Note subsequently rejects the substituted judgment standard as a legal fiction, and endorses the best interest test which necessarily comports with the evidence, and properly accounts for the disabled person's incompetency.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,General Medicine,Health(social science)
Reference14 articles.
1. The Wicked Witch is Almost Dead: Buck v. Bell and the Sterilization of Handicapped Persons,;Burgdorf;Temp. L.Q.,1977
2. Authorized Sterilization of the Mentally Retarded,;Me. L. Rev.,1987
3. Retarded Parents in Neglect Proceedings: The Erroneous Assumption of Parental Inadequacy
4. Sterilization of Mentally Retarded Persons: Reproductive Rights and Family Privacy,;Scott;Duke L.J.,1986
5. Organ Donations by Incompetents and the Substituted Judgment Doctrine
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献