Abstract
A substantial segment of the American population consists of adolescents. Adolescents, defined as persons between the ages of fourteen and eighteen, have traditionally been regarded as “minors” by law. Minors, as a group, are legally disabled, meaning they are presumed to lack the skills necessary for capable decision-making. Capable decision-making is requisite to the exercise of legal rights. Although the U.S. Supreme Court has extended federal constitutional guarantees to minors, including the liberty right for decision-making in intimate, personal matters, the Supreme Court has observed that vulnerability impairs their decision-making capability. Accordingly, the law regulates decision-making liberties of minors far more extensively than those of adults.The underlying tenet of law governing adolescents—that they lack the skills required for capable decision-making—seems well-settled. It is an artifact from an industrial society that spawned legislation authorizing governmental regulation of adolescents for education and labor in order to protect and promote their health and well-being.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,General Medicine,Health (social science)
Reference69 articles.
1. The Heuristics of Intellectual Due Process: A Primer for Triers of Science;Beecher-Monas;N.Y.U. L. REV.,2000
2. Parental Notice in State Abortion Statutes: Filling the Gap in Constitutional Jurisprudence;Friedman;COLUM. HUM. RTS. L. REV.,1998
3. Children's involvement in contested custody cases: Practices and experiences of legal and mental health professionals.
4. The Evidentiary Status of Social Science Under Daubert: Is it “Scientific,” “Technical,” or “Other Knowledge;Faigman;PSYCHOL. PUB. POL’Y L.,1995
5. The Ability of Adolescents to Predict Future Outcome Part I: Assessing Predictive Abilities;Trad;ADOLESCENCE,1993
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献