Abstract
Abstract
In May 2012, a former research assistant contacted the Montréal police about an interview he had conducted with Luka Magnotta for the SSHRC-funded research project Sex Work and Intimacy: Escorts and their Clients four years previously. That call ultimately resulted in the Parent and Bruckert v R and Magnotta case. Now, a decade later, we are positioned to reflect on the collective lessons learned (and lost) from the case. In this paper, we provide a lay of the Canadian confidentiality landscape before teasing out ten lessons from Parent c R. To do so, we draw on personal archives, survey results from sixty researchers, twelve key informant interviews with qualitative sociolegal and criminology researchers, and documentary analysis of university research policies. The lessons, which range from the clichéd, to the practical, to the frustrating, have implications for the individual work of Canadian researchers and for the collective work of academic institutions.
Funder
SSHRC Banting Postdoctoral Fellowship
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Sociology and Political Science
Reference51 articles.
1. The Subpoena of Ethnographic Data
2. Ethics Creep: Governing Social Science Research in the Name of Ethics
3. Chung, Andrew . 2012. Luka Rocco Magnotta manhunt continues; body-parts killing victim identified as Concordia student Lin Jun. Toronto Star, June 1, 2012. https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2012/06/01/luka_rocco_magnotta_manhunt_continues_bodyparts_killing_victim_identified_as_concordia_student_lin_jun.html
4. Legal Intrusion and the Politics of Fieldwork
5. Warmington, Joe . 2012. Could Magnotta hide as a woman? Toronto Sun, June 1, 2012. https://torontosun.com/2012/06/01/magnotta-travelling-as-a-woman
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. An In-Depth Qualitative Interview;Advances in Medical Technologies and Clinical Practice;2024-02-27