Author:
CASSIDY F.,AHEARN E.,MURRY E.,FOREST K.,CARROLL B. J.
Abstract
Background. There is not yet consensus on the best diagnostic definition of mixed bipolar episodes.
Many have suggested the DSM-III-R/-IV definition is too rigid. We propose alternative criteria
using data from a large patient cohort.Methods. We evaluated 237 manic in-patients using DSM-III-R criteria and the Scale for Manic
States (SMS). A bimodally distributed factor of dysphoric mood has been reported from the SMS
data. We used both the factor and the DSM-III-R classifications to identify candidate depressive
symptoms and then developed three candidate depressive symptom sets. Using ROC analysis we
determined the optimal threshold number of symptoms in each set and compared the three ROC
solutions. The optimal solution was tested against the DSM-III-R classification for cross-validation.Results. The optimal ROC solution was a set, derived from both the DSM-III-R and the SMS, and
the optimal threshold for diagnosis was two or more symptoms. Applying this set iteratively to the
DSM-III-R classification produced the identical ROC solution. The prevalence of mixed episodes
in the cohort was 13·9% by DSM-III-R, 20·2% by the dysphoria factor and 27·4% by the new ROC
solution.Conclusions. A diagnostic set of six dysphoric symptoms (depressed mood, anhedonia, guilt, suicide,
fatigue and anxiety), with a threshold of two symptoms, is proposed for a mixed episode. This new
definition has a foundation in clinical data, in the proved diagnostic performance of the qualifying
symptoms, and in ROC validation against two previous definitions that each have face validity.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Applied Psychology
Cited by
46 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献