Abstract
AbstractBackgroundEuthanasia and assisted suicide (EAS) based on a psychiatric disorder (psychiatric EAS) continue to pose ethical and policy challenges, even in countries where the practice has been allowed for years. We conducted a systematic review of reasons, a specific type of review for bioethical questions designed to inform rational policy-making. Our aims were twofold: (1) to systematically identify all published reasons for and against the practice (2) to identify current gaps in the debate and areas for future research.MethodsFollowing the PRISMA guidelines, we performed a search across seven electronic databases to include publications focusing on psychiatric EAS and providing ethical reasons. Reasons were grouped into domains by qualitative content analysis.ResultsWe included 42 articles, most of which were written after 2013. Articles in favor and against were evenly distributed. Articles in favor were mostly full-length pieces written by non-clinicians, with articles against mostly reactive, commentary-type pieces written by clinicians. Reasons were categorized into eight domains: (1) mental and physical illness and suffering (2) decisional capacity (3) irremediability (4) goals of medicine and psychiatry (5) consequences for mental health care (6) psychiatric EAS and suicide (7) self-determination and authenticity (8) psychiatric EAS and refusal of life-sustaining treatment. Parity- (or discrimination-) based reasons were dominant across domains, mostly argued for by non-clinicians, while policy reasons were mostly pointed to by clinicians.ConclusionsThe ethical debate about psychiatric EAS is relatively young, with prominent reasons of parity. More direct engagement is needed to address ethical and policy considerations.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Applied Psychology
Reference97 articles.
1. ‘TO THINE OWN SELF BE TRUE’: ON THE LOSS OF INTEGRITY AS A KIND OF SUFFERING
2. [Reaction on ‘assisted suicide in psychiatry; current situation and notes on a recent case’];Vink;Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie,2012
3. When unbearable suffering incites psychiatric patients to request euthanasia: qualitative study
4. Active and Passive Physician-Assisted Dying and the Terminal Disease Requirement
5. Vandenberghe, J. , Titeca, K. , Matthys, F. , Van den Broeck, K. , Detombe, T. , Claes, S. , … Van Buggenhout, R. (2017). Hoe omgaan met een euthanasieverzoek in psychiatrie binnen het huidig wettelijk kader? Adviestekst van de Vlaamse Vereniging voor Psychiatrie (VVP) over te hanteren zorgvuldigheidsvereisten. Retrieved from http://vvponline.be/uploads/docs/bib/euthanasie_finaal_vvp_1_dec.pdf (Accessed December 2018).
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献