Abstract
As the centennial of the First Red Scare arrives, the time has come to revisit our understanding of it. This methodological article makes the case that the field still struggles with the fundamental problem that the incidents we have collected as the “Red Scare” and “Red Summer” and madenational, manifested often as disparatelocalevents that responded to immediate conditions. It argues that responding to the local events of the Red Scare/Red Summer to better understand regional history is not an inadequate response that distracts us from a more worthy attempt to synthesize national currents. Through analyzing smaller-scale strikes and incidents of racial violence, looking at the variance in form and response of local governments, and seeing the global interconnections of the Red Scare through the lens of localities, we can gain new ground toward a broader, more multifaceted understanding of this transformative era.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference47 articles.
1. Bogalusa Burning: The War Against Biracial Unionism in the Deep South, 1919;Norwood;Journal of Southern History,1997
2. Public Workers: Labor and the Boston Police Strike of 1919
3. Florida labor and political “radicalism,” 1919–1920
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献