Abstract
Abstract
When surveyed, clear majorities express concern about inequality and view the government as responsible for addressing it. Scholars often interpret this view as popular support for redistribution. We question this interpretation, contending that many people have little grasp of what reducing inequality actually entails, and that this disconnect masks important variation in preferences over concrete policies. Using original survey and experimental US data, we provide systematic evidence in line with these conjectures. Furthermore, when asked about more concrete redistributive measures, support for government action changes significantly and aligns more closely with people's self-interest. These findings have implications for how egalitarian policies can be effectively communicated to the public, as well as methodological implications for the study of preferences on redistribution.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference21 articles.
1. Income perception, information, and progressive taxation: evidence from a survey experiment;Fernández-Albertos;Political Science Research and Methods,2018
2. Climate change: us public;Egan;Annual Review of Political Science,2017
3. Food comes first, then morals: redistribution preferences, parochial altruism, and immigration in Western Europe;Rueda;The Journal of Politics,2018
4. The Cultural Origins of Populism;Margalit;Available at SSRN 4001543 (2023),2023
5. Models of other-regarding preferences and redistribution;Dimick;Annual Review of Political Science,2017