Abstract
Abstract
Various robust communication effects have been identified, but evidence is overwhelmingly based on artificial survey treatments with limited real-world insight. I conducted a natural experiment on the impact of the European–Turkey statement closing the Balkan route during the 2015/16 European refugee crisis in Germany. This design tests the lasting effect of the statement's framing on public sentiment. I identify treatment and control groups based on timing to demonstrate its effect on perceptions of the crisis, asylum attitudes, and policy preferences. Effects are largest immediately following the announcement but decline rapidly. This shows political communication can significantly change opinion within a limited time frame. This study enhances our understanding of real-world communication effects and offers a broadly applicable methodology.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference41 articles.
1. Koelner Stadt-Anzeiger (2016) Nach flüchtlingspakt: In idomeni stirbt die hoffnung langsam.
2. The EU–Turkey refugee deal of autumn 2015 as a two-level game;Krumm;Turkish Journal of International Relations,2015
3. Where and when can we use Google Trends to measure issue salience?;Mellon;PS: Political Science and Politics,2013
4. Agenda-setting and mass communication theory;Shaw;Gazette (Leiden, Netherlands),1979
5. Esses, VM , Haddock, G and Zanna, MP (1993) Values, Stereotypes, and Emotions as Determinants of Intergroup Attitudes. In Mackie DM and Hamilton DL (eds), Affect, Cognition and Stereotyping. Elsevier, pp. 137–166.