Abstract
Abstract
Violent hostility between ordinary partisans is undermining American democracy. Social media is blamed for rhetoric threatening violence against political opponents and implicated in offline political violence. Focusing on Twitter, I propose a method to identify such rhetoric and investigate substantive patterns associated with it. Using a data set surrounding the 2020 Presidential Election, I demonstrate that violent tweets closely track contentious politics offline, peaking in the days preceding the Capitol Riot. Women and Republican politicians are targeted with such tweets more frequently than men and non-Republican politicians. Violent tweets, while rare, spread widely through communication networks, reaching those without direct ties to violent users on the fringe of the networks. This paper is the first to make sense of violent partisan hostility expressed online, contributing to the fields of partisanship, contentious politics, and political communication.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference141 articles.
1. Olteanu, A , Castillo, C , Boy, J and Varshney, KR (2018) The effect of extremist violence on hateful speech online. In Twelfth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.
2. Davidson, S , Sun, Q and Wojcieszak, M (2020) Developing a new classifier for automated identification of incivility in social media. In Proceedings of the fourth workshop on online abuse and harms. pp. 95–101.
3. Pratt, D (2017) Islamophobia as reactive co-radicalization. In Religious Citizenships and Islamophobia. Routledge, pp. 85–98.
4. Political Violence and the Mediating Role of Violent Extremist Propensities
5. Kalmoe, NP and Mason, L (2018) Lethal mass partisanship: Prevalence, correlates, and electoral contingencies. In American Political Science Association Conference.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献