Abstract
We assessed the quality of evidence for the use of erythromycin
in preventing secondary
transmission of pertussis to close contacts of primary cases.
A literature search was undertaken
and identified papers were reviewed critically. Thirteen original papers
and 1 manuscript met
the inclusion criteria for review (3 randomized controlled trials, 4 analytical
studies and 7
descriptive studies). Evidence from both experimental and
analytical studies showed little effect
of the use of erythromycin in preventing secondary transmission. Its effect
is at best modest
when compared with the protection conferred by use of good quality whole
cell vaccine. Three
studies reported adverse events with erythromycin prophylaxis; these were
mainly nausea,
vomiting and abdominal pain. In countries where effective pertussis vaccines
are in use,
erythromycin use should be confined to close contacts of cases, particularly
unimmunized
children or partially immunized infants who would be most susceptible to
the complications of
pertussis, or adults who come into close contact with vulnerable children.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Epidemiology
Cited by
31 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献