Deathbed wills: assessing testamentary capacity in the dying patient

Author:

Peisah C.,Luxenberg J.,Liptzin B.,Wand A.P.,Shulman K.,Finkel S.

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackground:Deathbed wills by their nature are susceptible to challenge. Clinicians are frequently invited to give expert opinion about a dying testator's testamentary capacity and/or vulnerability to undue influence either contemporaneously, when the will is made, or retrospectively upon a subsequent challenge, yet there is minimal discourse in this area to assist practice.Methods:The IPA Capacity Taskforce explored the issue of deathbed wills to provide clinicians with an approach to the assessment of testamentary capacity at the end of life. A systematic review searching PubMed and Medline using the terms: “deathbed and wills,” “deathbed and testamentary capacity,” and “dying and testamentary capacity” yielded one English-language paper. A search of the individual terms “testamentary capacity” and “deathbed” yielded one additional relevant paper. A focused selective review was conducted using these papers and related terms such as “delirium and palliative care.” We present two cases to illustrate the key issues here.Results:Dying testators are vulnerable to delirium and other physical and psychological comorbidities. Delirium, highly prevalent amongst terminal patients and manifesting as either a hyperactive or hypoactive state, is commonly missed and poorly documented. Whether the person has testamentary capacity depends on whether they satisfy the Banks v Goodfellow legal criteria and whether they are free from undue influence. Regardless of the clinical diagnosis, the ultimate question is can the testator execute a specific will with due consideration to its complexity and the person's circumstances?Conclusions:Dual ethical principles of promoting autonomy of older people with mental disorders whilst protecting them against abuse and exploitation are at stake here. To date, there has been scant discourse in the scientific literature regarding this issue.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Geriatrics and Gerontology,Gerontology,Clinical Psychology

Reference40 articles.

1. The strange interplay of testamentary capacity and the doctrine of undue influence: are we protecting older testators or overriding individual preferences?

2. Bentham J. (1843). Of wills. In Principles of the Civil Code, Vol. 1 of 11 volumes of Bentham's Works, Part 2, Ch. 4 (pp. 1838–1843) (published under the Superintendence of his Executor, John Bowring). Edinburgh, UK: William Tait. Available at: http://www.laits.utexas.edu/poltheory/bentham/pcc/pcc.pa02.c04.html; last accessed 23 October 2013.

3. [“Can one make gifts on one's deathbed?”];Sykepleien,1969

4. Delirium in terminally ill cancer patients;Massie;American Journal of Psychiatry,1983

5. Assessment of Testamentary Capacity and Vulnerability to Undue Influence

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3