Abstract
In the mid-summer of 2012, a sort of Historikerstreit broke out in Hungary. The main topics of the controversy were the language of and the attitude to the history of the Holocaust. In what follows I will argue that the Hungarian Historikerstreit is closely related to both the renaissance of the Horthy era (1920–1944) in current Hungarian politics and the ambivalent attitude towards the Holocaust in public memory. Since 2010, Hungary has celebrated ‘Trianon commemoration day’, remembering on the peace treaty of Trianon after the First World War. In today’s Hungary, Trianon seems to be a permanent trauma of the nation not only in the public memory but also in history writing. In spite of the fact that many respected scholars argue that currently the construction of the trauma of Trianon has a hegemonic position in Hungarian social memory and that the Holocaust cannot compete with it, I will show that the Trianon trauma is a construction of the current politics of history, which overshadows the tragic experiences of the First World War. Moreover, Trianon and the Holocaust are strongly interconnected historical events, which cannot be understood separately.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference42 articles.
1. 1. Erős F. (2007) Trauma és történelem [Trauma and History] (Budapest: Jószöveg)
2. 2. J. L. Herman (1992) Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence from Domestic Abuse to Political Terror (New York: Basic Books).
3. See Kolozsi Á. (2012) Social constructions of the native faith: Mytho-historical Narratives and Identity-discourse of Hungarian Neopaganism. PhD Dissertation CEU Budapest 2012. www.etd.ceu.hu/2012/kolozsi_adam.pdf.
4. 4. See Radnóti S. (2002) The glass cabinet. An essay about the place of the Hungarian crown. Acta Historiae Artium, 43(1), pp. 83-111
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献