Abstract
Falsifiability is the cornerstone of science. However, Rutherford notwithstanding, almost by definition science functions at the limits of measurement accuracy and theoretical grasp, so that statistical analysis is central to scientific advance. This applies as much to physics as it does to psychology, as much to geology as to biology. I look at some of the potholes in the path of scientific discovery, showing how easy it is to stumble, and at some of the consequences for the scientific endeavour.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference14 articles.
1. The Skeptical Environmentalist
2. Lehrer J. (2010) The truth wears off: is there something wrong with the scientific method? The New Yorker, 13 December. http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/12/13/101213fa_fact_lehrer?currentPage=all
3. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False