Abstract
AbstractAs part of protectionist policy in eighteenth-century Britain, imported silks were banned from being sold. Although it is known that bans on imported textiles were widely broken, there have been few systematic studies of the contraband trade in silks. Using customs' records, this article shows how smuggling supplied the demand for imported consumer goods. The illegal trade in silk was diverse, bringing in a variety of products from Asia and Europe. The evidence supports a market segmentation analysis of the different products and their consumers. The trade with Asia supplied “populuxe goods” in the form of handkerchiefs that appealed to a broad, middling customer base. These were brought into the country by the East India Company's trading network. By contrast, continental Europe provided contraband for the high-fashion market. These silks were distributed in more informal and personal ways—travelers and diplomats being the main offenders. The official response to these black markets differed, with silks from Europe posing particular problems for enforcement. Finally, this article provides a reassessment of the transnational influences—specifically the relative importance of Asia and Europe—on production and consumption of consumer goods in Britain.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference33 articles.
1. Material Culture and the Other: European Encounters with Chinese Porcelain, ca. 1650-1800
2. Consumption conundrums unravelled
3. Rethinking Inventories in the Digital Age: The Case of the Old Bailey;Helmreich;Journal of Art Historiography,2014
4. East & West: Textiles and Fashion in Early Modern Europe
5. Report of Committee on the Silk Industry;Sabatier;Journals of the House of Commons,1766
Cited by
24 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献