Across the Great Divide: Popular Music Studies and the Public

Author:

HAMILTON JACK

Abstract

AbstractThis contribution reflects on the historical and present condition of the academic field of popular music studies' relationship to the non-academic public, particularly within the context of increased institutional demands for scholarly ‘public engagement'. I begin by discussing various reasons why a continued, sustained engagement with non-academic voices and communities should remain a central priority of popular music studies. I then move to a discussion of certain vantage points and modes of expertise that popular music scholars can offer to broader musical publics, particularly as relating to the political economy of commercial music media and urgent necessities of historical archiving and preservation. In closing, I argue that a renewed commitment to ‘public engagement' also offers a more robust engagement with our field’s own history, and might serve as a way of honouring its intellectual pioneers, many of whom did foundational work well outside the traditional boundaries of the academy.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Music,Music

Reference57 articles.

1. Eggerston, Chris . ‘Lawsuits Against Universal Music Over 2008 Vault Fire Expected Soon’. Billboard, 14 June 2019. www.billboard.com/articles/business/8516088/universal-music-group-2008-vault-fire-lawsuits-expected-soon (accessed 26 October 2020).

2. Sweet, Sam . ‘After Katrina, a Priceless Musical Archive Was Thought Lost. It Showed Up in Torrance’. Los Angeles Times, 28 August 2019. www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/music/story/2019-08-28/allen-toussaint-new-orelans-hurricane-katrina-mike-nishita (accessed 26 October 2020).

3. St Felix, Doreen . ‘The Autofictions of Kendrick Lamar’. New Yorker, 26 July 2017. www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/the-autofictions-of-kendrick-lamar (accessed 26 October 2020).

4. Whitaker, Manya . ‘Which Publications Matter at Which Stages of Your Career?’ Chronicle of Higher Education, 23 September 2019. www.chronicle.com/article/Which-Publications-Matter-at/247192 (accessed 26 October 2020).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3