Abstract
This paper suggests there are, at present, four
main kinds of cognitive rehabilitation programs for brain
injured people. The first attempts to rehabilitate cognitive
deficits through drills and exercises. The second uses
theoretical models from cognitive psychology to identify
deficits in order to remediate them. The third is primarily
a patient-driven approach that uses a combination of learning
theory, cognitive psychology, and neuropsychology to identify
and remediate cognitive difficulties. The fourth is the
holistic approach that has, as its basic philosophy,
a belief that cognitive functions cannot be divorced from
emotion, motivation, or other noncognitive functions, and
consequently all aspects of functioning should be addressed
in rehabilitation programs. Despite some overlap between
these approaches, there are major differences. The two
main arguments offered in this paper are (1) that the first
two approaches do not lead to good clinical rehabilitation
practice; and (2) that a synthesis of the second two approaches
would result in the best cognitive rehabilitation model.
(JINS, 1997, 3, 487–496.)
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Neurology,Clinical Psychology,General Neuroscience
Cited by
175 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献