Breaking the Percent Memory Retention Ceiling using Bayesian Statistics

Author:

Venkatesan Umesh M.ORCID,Rabinowitz Amanda R.,Riccitello Rachael M.

Abstract

AbstractObjectives:Neuropsychological tests of episodic memory often include a measure of memory retention to facilitate the diagnosis of memory disorders. However, the traditional percent retention (PR) score has limited interpretability when smaller amounts of information are both initially learned and later recalled, creating a pseudo-ceiling effect. To improve psychometrics of PR, we investigated a scoring procedure that incorporates levels of certainty into estimates of memory retention based on learning level.Methods:Word-list recall data from adults with traumatic brain injury were modeled using a uniform prior in the Bayesian framework. From the resultant posterior probability distributions, we derived a measure referred to as retention probability (RPr), which distinguishes the retention of relatively good and poor learners. PR and RPr scores were compared on their distributional properties and associations with theoretically related memory measures.Results:Significant distributional differences between PR and RPr were observed. RPr removed the conspicuous ceiling of PR, resulting in stronger correlational and predictive relationships with other memory measures.Conclusion:A Bayesian procedure for quantifying memory retention has psychometric advantages and potentially widespread applicability for measuring the change in behavioral features over time. Future directions are briefly discussed. A sample RPr calculator is provided for interactive exploration of the method.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Neurology (clinical),Clinical Psychology,General Neuroscience

Reference15 articles.

1. Lee, I.A. & Preacher, K.J. (2013). Calculation for the test of the difference between two dependent correlations with one variable in common. http://quantpsy.org

2. Diagnostic Accuracy of Memory Measures in Alzheimer’s Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

3. Bayesian Data Analysis

4. Posterior predictive arguments in favor of the Bayes-Laplace prior as the consensus prior for binomial and multinomial parameters;Tuyl;Bayesian Analysis,2009

5. Measuring forgetting: A critical review of accelerated long-term forgetting studies

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3