Increasing food insecurity severity is associated with lower diet quality in Australian adults

Author:

Kent K.,Schumacher T.,Kocar S.,Seivwright A.,Visentin D.,Collins C.E.,Lester L.

Abstract

Food insecurity, the inadequate or insecure access to food due to financial constraints, is a growing concern in high-income countries like Australia(1). Food insecure adults may have reduced diet quality due to constraints on food purchasing and consumption(2) but further research is needed to understand how the severity of food insecurity impacts diet quality in an Australian setting. This study aimed to examine the relationship between diet quality and increasing severity of household food insecurity using validated measurement tools. A cross-sectional, online survey of Australian adults (aged 18 years+) used the USDA Household Food Security Six-item Short Form to classify respondents as food secure or marginally, moderately, or severely food insecure. The Australian Recommended Food Score (ARFS; score between 0–73) determined diet quality (ARFS total) and sub-scale scores for eight food groups(3), with higher scores indicating higher diet quality. Diet quality score results are further categorised as “needs work” (<33), “getting there” (33-38), “excellent” (39-46) or “outstanding” (47+). Survey-weighted linear regression (adjusted for age, sex, income, education, location, household composition) analyses indicate that 45% of participants were living in households that experienced food insecurity, comprising 7% marginally, 18% moderately and 20% severely food insecure households. The ARFS total survey-weighted mean score for the whole sample (n = 804) was 32.4 (SD = 9.8). As the severity of household food insecurity increased, ARFS scores decreased. Marginally food insecure respondents reported a mean ARFS score three points lower than food-secure adults (B=-2.7; 95%CI [−5.11, −0.34]; p = 0.03), and scores reduced by six points for moderately (B=-5.6; 95%CI [−7.26, −3.90]; p<0.001) and twelve points for severely food insecure respondents (B=-11.5; 95%CI [−13.21, −9.78]; p<0.001). Marginally food insecure respondents had significantly lower vegetable sub-scale scores, moderately food insecure respondents had significantly lower sub-scale scores for all food groups except dairy, severely food insecure respondents had significantly lower scores for all sub-scale scores. Poorer diet quality is evident in adults living with any food insecurity but gets progressively worse as the severity of food insecurity increases. Interventions to reduce food insecurity and increase diet quality are required to prevent adverse nutrition-related health outcomes in food-insecure populations in Australia and beyond.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3