Green Parties in Federal Systems: Resistant or Compliant to Centralizing Pressures?

Author:

Miragliotta Narelle,Jackson Stewart

Abstract

Green parties promote decentralization as a functional organizing principle but also a normative goal. This has been most vividly realized through the creation of comparatively devolved party structures. In federations, this can assume a territorial dimension and may lead to the adoption of confederal or federal models of party organization. Surprisingly little work has been undertaken on these arrangements when they have been implemented by green parties. This article explores whether the normative commitment by green parties to decentralized party arrangements is sufficient to preserve the integrity of dispersed party structures. This is done by examining the Australian Greens. We find that there has been gradual growth of the party’s national stratum, even in spite of formal provisions which guarantee the autonomy of the state organizations. It is argued that one of the main agents driving this outcome has been the Greens’ expanding federal parliamentary wing.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science

Reference85 articles.

1. Canadian Green Party (CGP) (2010), Constitution of the Green Party of Canada (last amended 2010).

2. Australian Greens (2008), ‘Australian Greens National Conference Minutes, Brisbane, Qld, 7–9 November 2008’, in the Archive of the Australian Greens, Melbourne, Victoria.

3. Koop R. and Sharman C. (2008), ‘The Elusive Nature of National Party Organization in Canada and Australia’, paper presented at the Canadian Political Science Association Annual Conference, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC, 4–6 June.

4. An Integrated Theory of Party Goals and Party Change

5. Multi-Level Relations in Political Parties

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Conclusion;Political Campaigning and Communication;2021

2. Introduction;Political Campaigning and Communication;2021

3. Labouring under a delusion? Scotland’s national questions and the crisis of the Scottish Labour Party;Territory, Politics, Governance;2020-04-08

4. Lost in the Process? The impact of devolution on abortion law in the United Kingdom;The British Journal of Politics and International Relations;2019-07-30

5. Party institutionalization as multilevel concept: base- versus elite-level routinization;Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft;2019-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3