Abstract
Comparing bank rescue schemes in France and Germany during the banking crisis of 2008–9, this article argues that collective inaction is a little-studied aspect in the exercise of power in business–government relations. Contrary to studies that focus on lobbying, structural power or the influence of beliefs, the comparison highlights that governments depend on contributions from the financial industry during crisis management. In the negotiations to design bank support schemes, some countries, such as France, succeeded in engaging their financial sector collectively. Such public–private burden-sharing arrangements alleviate the public budget and increase mutual surveillance between banks during government support. In other countries, such as Germany, a collectively organized industry response failed, which forced the government to design an entirely public support scheme. The German government reacted to this perceived imbalance by imposing tighter banking regulation to avoid a repetition of the impotence it experienced in 2008.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Reference40 articles.
1. Cour des Comptes (2010), ‘Les concours publics aux établissements de crédit: Bilan et enseignement à tirer’, Public Report, www.ccomptes.fr/publications.
2. Cour des Comptes (2009), ‘Les Concours publics aux établissements de crédit: premiers constats, premières recommandations’, Public Report, www.ccomptes.fr/publications.
3. The Politics of the German Company Network
4. Two Faces of Power
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献