Abstract
Abstract
Email can deliver mobilization messages at considerably lower cost than direct mail. While voters’ email addresses are readily available, experimental work from 2007 to 2012 suggests that email mobilization is ineffective in most contexts. Here, we use public data to reexamine the effectiveness of email mobilization in the 2016 Florida general election. Unsolicited emails sent from a university professor and designed to increase turnout had the opposite effect: emails slightly demobilizing voters. While the overall decrease in turnout amounted to less than 1 percent of the margin of victory in the presidential race in the state, the demobilizing effect was particularly pronounced among minority voters. Compared to voters from the same group who were assigned to control, black voters assigned to receive emails were 2.2 percentage points less likely to turn out, and Latino voters were 1.0 percentage point less likely to turn out. These findings encourage both campaigns and researchers to think critically about the use and study of massive impersonal mobilization methods.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference23 articles.
1. Pushing too hard: Using doorin-the-face to get voters out the door.;McCabe;Journal of Political Marketing,2015
2. Avoiding post-treatment bias in audit experiments.;Coppock;Journal of Experimental Political Science,2019
3. Roose, Kevin . 2018. “Campaigns Enter Texting Era With a Plea: Will U Vote 4 Me?” The New York Times. URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/01/technology/campaign-text-messages.html
4. Does email boost turnout.;Nickerson;Quarterly Journal of Political Science,2007
5. The differential effects of stress on voter turnout.;Hassell;Political Psychology,2017
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献