COERCION, FRAUD, AND WHAT IS WRONG WITH BLACKMAIL

Author:

Galoob Stephen

Abstract

ABSTRACTSeveral theorists argue that blackmail is morally wrong because the blackmail proposal is coercive. These coercion-based views are promising but incomplete. A full explanation of blackmail's immorality must address both the blackmail proposal and the blackmail agreement. I defend what I call the complex account, on which blackmail is morally wrong because blackmail proposals are coercive and blackmail agreements are fraudulent. The complex account avoids difficulties that beset other coercion-based views and provides a stronger case for why blackmail should be criminalized.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Law,Philosophy

Reference55 articles.

1. Coercion without Baselines: Unconstitutional Conditions in Three Dimensions;Berman;Geo. L.J.,2001

2. A Formal Approach to Contractual Duress

3. Novel Criminal Fraud;Buell;N.Y.U. L. Rev.,2006

4. Paternalism, Unconscionability Doctrine, and Accommodation

5. Berman on Blackmail: Taking Motives Fervently;Block;Fla. St. U. Bus. Rev.,2003

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Revisiting Coercion as an Element of Prohibited Intervention in International Law;American Journal of International Law;2023-10

2. Selling Silence: The Morality of Sexual Harassment NDA s;Journal of Applied Philosophy;2022-05-31

3. Contract cheating and blackmail: a risky business?;Studies in Higher Education;2020-02-25

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3