Abstract
Lawyers and philosophers have misunderstood the rights of bequest and inheritance within Locke's theory of property. While lawyers assume these are unqualified natural rights, philosophers find Locke's account of them so inadequate as to cast their existence into serious doubt. But on Locke's theory, the rights of bequest and inheritance are neither absolute nor incoherent. Locke treats inheritance as a form of imputed bequest, whereby natural law imputes to the intestate an intention to leave his goods to his closest family members. Both bequest and inheritance find their justification in the prerogatives of owners to dispose of their property. These prerogatives are not without limit, however. The needs of a decedent's dependents trump specific bequests, and both bequest and inheritance are subject to the duty of charity. Bequest and inheritance thus order the relative claims of owners and others so that they are consistent with Locke's more general theory of property.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference20 articles.
1. Is Inheritance Justified?;Haslett;Phil. and Pub. Aff.,1986
2. Enough and as Good Left for Others
3. The Myth of Ownership
4. The Mitigation Principle: Toward a General Theory of Contractual Obligation
5. Inalienable Rights and Locke's Treatises;Simmons;Phil. and Pub. Aff.,1983
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Inheritance;International Encyclopedia of Ethics;2022-05-12
2. Organs as inheritable property?;Journal of Medical Ethics;2013-08-30