Abstract
AbstractThis Article analyses the evolution of the public security defence to justify restrictions on free movement within the EU in the context of the energy sector. Taking the seminal 1984Campus Oilcase as the point of departure for its analysis, the Article focuses on the interplay between public security and energy security and shows two key changes in the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union. First, it demonstrates how the scope of the public security defence in the energy sector has gradually narrowed. Second, it shows how the public security defence has developed to take into account evolving social, technological, and legal contexts in the EU energy sector. Culminating in cases likeHidroelectricain 2020 andOPALin 2021, analysis of the relevant case law suggests that, despite the societal dependence on energy and the ongoing geopolitical turmoil in Europe, the Court of Justice interprets exceptions from free movement in an increasingly strict manner, highlighting the primacy of internal market approaches to energy security.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference21 articles.
1. The Human Right to Access Electricity
2. A Human Rights Approach to Energy: Realizing the Rights of Billions Within Ecological Limits;Wewerinke-Singh;Review of European, Comparative and International European Law,2022
3. Energy security policies in EU-25—The expected cost of oil supply disruptions