CRITERIA FOR SELECTING DESIGN PROCESS MODELLING APPROACHES

Author:

Trauer Jakob,Wöhr Ferdinand,Eckert Claudia,Kannengiesser Udo,Knippenberg Sjoerd,Sankowski Olga,Zimmermann Markus

Abstract

AbstractProcess models are among the principal artefacts used for managing design projects. However, the selection of effective modelling approaches can be difficult for design project managers, given that a plethora of tools exists for various modelling purposes. In addition to date no systematic approach for the assessment and selection of process modelling approaches is available to practitioners. This paper presents the development of criteria for benchmarking and selecting different process modelling tools. The results are based on three elements. (1) In a four-hour workshop undertaken by the Design Process SIG of the Design Society, bringing together around 20 international researchers and practitioners in design process modelling, an initial set of 58 criteria were brainstormed and consolidated during the workshop and in follow-up meetings. (2) The consolidated criteria were then compared with literature. The finalised criteria list was then validated by external experts in industry (3). The resulting list of 12 criteria provides a sound basis for practitioners to support a systematic selection of process modelling approaches. Further, it lays the foundation of a benchmarking tool, which is subject to future work.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Reference32 articles.

1. Helten, Katharina ; Eckert, Claudia M. ; Gericke, Kilian ; Vermaas, Pieter (2021): Concept for a Persona Driven Recommendation Tool for Process Modelling Approaches. In Review. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED21). Gothenburg, Sweden, August 16-20, 2021. The Design Society: Cambridge University Press.

2. Piccolo, Sebastiano A. ; Trauer, Jakob ; Wilberg, Julian ; Maier, Anja M. (2018): Understanding task execution time in relation to the multilayer project structure: empirical evidence. In: DS 96: The 20th International DSM Conference. 20th International Dependency and Structure Modelling Conference (DSM 2018), pp. 129–138.

3. Kaschek, Roland ; Pavlov, Roman ; Shekhovtsov, Vladimir A. ; Zlatkin, Sergiy (2006): Towards selecting among business process modeling methodologies. In 1617–5468. Available online at https://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/24153.

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Integrating life cycle assessment into the building design process—a review;Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability;2024-04-02

2. PADDME—Process Analysis for Digital Development in Mechanical Engineering;Processes;2024-01-11

3. Choosing Effective Means: Awareness of Bias in the Selection of Methods and Tools;Handbook of Engineering Systems Design;2023

4. Using Unified Modeling Language to Analyze Business Processes in the Delivery of Child Health Services;International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health;2022-10-18

5. Vorgehensmodell zur Erstellung Digitaler Zwillinge für Produktion und Logistik;Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb;2022-10-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3