Author:
Mishra A K,Mallick A,Galagali J R,Gupta A,Sethi A,Ghotra A
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of bone pâté versus bioactive glass in mastoid obliteration.MethodThis randomised parallel groups study was conducted at a tertiary care centre between September 2017 and August 2019. Sixty-eight patients, 33 males and 35 females, aged 12–56 years, randomly underwent single-stage canal wall down mastoidectomy with mastoid obliteration using either bone pâté (n = 35) or bioactive glass (n = 33), and were evaluated 12 months after the operation.ResultsA dry epithelised cavity (Merchant's grade 0 or 1) was achieved in 65 patients (95.59 per cent). Three patients (4.41 per cent) showed recidivism. The mean air–bone gap decreased to 16.80 ± 4.23 dB from 35.10 ± 5.21 dB pre-operatively. The mean Glasgow Benefit Inventory score was 30.02 ± 8.23. There was no significant difference between the two groups in these outcomes. However, the duration of surgery was shorter in the bioactive glass group (156.87 ± 7.83 vs 162.28 ± 8.74 minutes; p = 0.01).ConclusionThe efficacy of both materials was comparable.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Otorhinolaryngology,General Medicine
Reference29 articles.
1. Antibacterial effects and dissolution behavior of six bioactive glasses;Zhang;J Biomed Mater Res,2010
2. Anatomical, functional and quality-of-life results for mastoid and epitympanic obliteration with bioactive glass s53p4: a prospective clinical study;Bernardeschi;Clin Otolaryngol,2017
3. Canal wall down approach for tympano-mastoid cholesteatoma: long-term results and prognostic factors;Pareschi;Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital,2019
4. Is there epithelial tissue in bone pate? A histopathology study;Yorgancilar;Int Adv Otol,2012
5. A prospective analysis of post mastoidectomy cavity complications;Rajan;Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2019
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献