Abstract
Ricardo “and his chief followers … did not express their meaning with sufficient clearness, and they have been misunderstood by all but the most careful readers” (Marshall, 1920, p. 84).“Ricardo … has not been fortunate in finding careful students” (Cairnes, 1874, p. 237).
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Arts and Humanities
Reference53 articles.
1. Review of Hollander 1979,;Stigler;Journal of Economic Literature,1981
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. English School of Political Economy;The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics;2018
2. Samuel Bailey and the question of his ‘influence’: a sceptical view;Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology;2010-01
3. English School of Political Economy;The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics;2008
4. Let us now praise famous men;Adam Smith Review;2007-12-20
5. The 'Sussex School' and the history of economic thought: British Intellectual History, 1750-1950;The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought;2002-09