Abstract
This paper reconsiders the supposed agreement of David Ricardo and William Nassau Senior on the question of the method of political economy. The first part shows that Senior was very critical about Ricardo’s approach to economic phenomena and considered that this question of method had important consequences on theoretical points. The second part analyzes the way Ricardo was dealing with economics. It shows that though Senior was right in considering that their respective methods were different and led to important analytical divergences, he nevertheless misunderstood Ricardo’s method with a hypothetico-deductive one. The consequence is that Senior’s criticisms on Ricardo’s theories of rent, natural wages, and of the tendencies of agricultural returns to decrease and of profit to fall are ill-founded, being based on a misunderstanding of the way they were established.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Arts and Humanities
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Ricardo's encounter with philosophers and political economists;David Ricardo. An Intellectual Biography;2021-09-28
2. Travel, Travel Writing, and British Political Economy;ROUTL RES TRAV WRIT;2021-09-13
3. Introduction;Travel, Travel Writing, and British Political Economy;2021-09-13
4. Lord William Wyndham Grenville’s manuscript notes on the first edition of David Ricardo’s Principles;The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought;2020-03-25
5. Bibliographie;Histoire de la pensée économique;2018-03-28