Abstract
Economists regularly appear as expert witnesses in antitrust litigations. This paper analyzes how their models and methodologies have performed vis-à-vis the standards of relevance and reliability affirmed by the US Supreme Court in Daubert and its progeny. Some explanations for the economists’ troubles when facing a Daubert challenge in antitrust cases are provided.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Arts and Humanities
Reference41 articles.
1. The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement
2. Setting Boundaries between Science and Law: Lessons from Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
3. “Doing Good Economics in the Courtroom: Thoughts on Daubert and Expert Testimony in Antitrust;Solow;Journal of Corporation Law,2006
4. The Scope of Expert Testimony on the Subject of Conspiracy in a Sherman Act Case;Milne;Antitrust,2003
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献