Author:
Duarte Pedro Garcia,Giraud Yann
Abstract
This paper offers a bibliographic survey of the literature in the history of economic thought (HET) in eight major economics journals, using theJELclassification to retrieve and analyze the relevant literature. Our study shows that, though contributions to HET are still found in top economics journals, the rate of publication of such papers has become increasingly uneven, and the methods and narrative styles they adopt are remote from those used by historians of economics. We show that the widespread idea that historians should address current economists by using their (mostly mathematical) tools and techniques is hardly present in mainstream journals, and discuss the role of editors and editorial boards of the different journals we survey in shaping these changes over time. We conclude that historians should focus on doing good work on their own, rather than try to figure out what the economists’ preferences are, and undertake research accordingly.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Arts and Humanities
Reference74 articles.
1. “From Parlor Games to Social Science: Von Neumann, Morgenstern, and the Creation of Game Theory, 1928–1944.”;Leonard;Journal of Economic Literature,1995
2. “Two Kinds of ‘History of Economics.’”;Waterman;History of Economic Ideas,2008
3. “No History of Ideas, Please, We’re Economists.”;Blaug;Journal of Economic Literature,2001
4. What Did Smith Mean by the Invisible Hand?
5. Six Decades of Top Economics Publishing: Who and How?
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献