Abstract
The Ricardian dynamics are based on the study of the order of cultivation when demand increases. Piero Sraffa criticized David Ricardo for having assumed that the incoming method is defined by a natural order, and stressed that the law of succession of methods is based on a profitability criterion. Then, in the case of intensive cultivation, the question is whether the incoming method is indeed more productive than the one it replaces. Sraffa’s argument relies on the positivity of rent. However, there is a flaw in his reasoning, and a failure of the Ricardian dynamics is possible. Post-Sraffian scholars have misunderstood that construction and have substituted a static approach for it. The critiques they address to Sraffa are better understood by returning to Ricardo and Sraffa’s own methodology. Fifty years ago, mathematicians rediscovered Ricardo’s approach independently and worked out a powerful algorithm inspired by it.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Arts and Humanities
Reference22 articles.
1. ON THE UNIQUENESS OF SQUARE COST-MINIMIZING TECHNIQUES
2. Erreygers Guido . 1990. “Terre, Rente et Choix de Techniques.” PhD thesis. Two volumes. Mimeo. University Paris X-Nanterre.
3. Klimovsky Edith . 1981. “La rente dans la théorie de la valeur et des prix.” PhD thesis. Mimeo. University of Paris X-Nanterre.
4. “Capitale tecnico nei modelli dinamici ricardiani.”;Freni;Studi Economici,1991
5. The dynamics of intensive cultivation