Author:
OLIVER J. ERIC,HA SHANG E.
Abstract
Despite the importance of local elections in the United States, political scientists have little knowledge of what shapes vote choice in most municipalities and special districts, particularly in the suburbs where a majority of Americans live. This article develops and tests models of local voting behavior using unique survey data of over 1,400 voters in 30 different suburban communities. Suburban electoral politics are dominated by a nonrepresentative group of “stakeholders,” who are highly informed and interested in local affairs. Because of this, vote choice in suburban elections ends up sharing many characteristics with larger contests (i.e., issue salience, partisanship, and candidate likeability), although their impact varies with the size and diversity of the particular community (e.g., in smaller suburbs, voters are more engaged in local politics, more likely to know candidates personally, and more likely to vote against incumbents). These findings suggest the importance of developing new theories about voting behavior in micro-electoral contexts.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference51 articles.
1. Dahl Robert A 1961.Who Governs?: Democracy and Power in an American City.New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
2. Lowery David , and William E. Lyons 1989.“The Impact of Jurisdictional Boundaries: An Individual-Level Test of the Tiebout Model.”Journal of Politics 51 (February):73–97.
3. Fischel William 2001.The Homevoter Hypothesis.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
4. Oliver J. Eric 2001.Democracy in Suburbia.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
5. Zaller John 1992.The Nature and Origin of Mass Opinion.New York:Cambridge University Press.
Cited by
163 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献