Abstract
How do social group boundaries evolve? Does the appearance of a new out-group change the in-group’s perceptions of other out-groups? We introduce a conceptual framework of context-dependent categorization in which exposure to one minority leads to recategorization of other minorities as in- or out-groups depending on perceived distances across groups. We test this framework by studying how Mexican immigration to the United States affected white Americans’ attitudes and behaviors toward Black Americans. We combine survey and crime data with a difference-in-differences design and an instrumental variables strategy. Consistent with the theory, Mexican immigration improves whites’ racial attitudes, increases support for pro-Black government policies, and lowers anti-Black hate crimes while simultaneously increasing prejudice against Hispanics. Results generalize beyond Hispanics and Blacks, and a survey experiment provides direct evidence for recategorization. Our findings imply that changes in the size of one group can affect the entire web of intergroup relations in diverse societies.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference81 articles.
1. Assessing Contextual Measurement Strategies
2. Acculturating Contexts and Anglo Opposition to Immigration in the United States
3. Ruggles, Steven , Flood, Sarah , Goeken, Ronald , Grover, Josiah , and Meyer, Erin . 2019. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 9.0 [computer file]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota [distributor].
4. What Triggers Public Opposition to Immigration? Anxiety, Group Cues, and Immigration Threat
5. Politics beyond Black and White
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献