Author:
BLATTMAN CHRISTOPHER,HARTMAN ALEXANDRA C.,BLAIR ROBERT A.
Abstract
Dispute resolution institutions facilitate agreements and preserve the peace whenever property rights are imperfect. In weak states, strengthening formal institutions can take decades, and so state and aid interventions also try to shape informal practices and norms governing disputes. Their goal is to improve bargaining and commitment, thus limiting disputes and violence. Mass education campaigns that promote alternative dispute resolution (ADR) are common examples of these interventions. We studied the short-term impacts of one such campaign in Liberia, where property disputes are endemic. Residents of 86 of 246 towns randomly received training in ADR practices and norms; this training reached 15% of adults. One year later, treated towns had higher resolution of land disputes and lower violence. Impacts spilled over to untrained residents. We also saw unintended consequences: more extrajudicial punishment and (weakly) more nonviolent disagreements. Results imply that mass education can change high-stakes behaviors, and improving informal bargaining and enforcement behavior can promote order in weak states.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference32 articles.
1. North Douglass C. 1994. “Institutions and Credible Commitment.” Working Paper in Economic History 9412002. St. Louis: Washington University.
2. Alternative Dispute Resolution: Panacea or Anathema?
3. Anthropology and the Study of Alternative Dispute Resolution;Merry;Journal of Legal Education,1984
4. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change
5. Civic Education and Democratic Backsliding in the Wake of Kenya’s Post-2007 Election Violence
Cited by
129 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献