Author:
HEALY ANDREW,MALHOTRA NEIL
Abstract
Do voters effectively hold elected officials accountable for policy decisions? Using data on natural disasters, government spending, and election returns, we show that voters reward the incumbent presidential party for delivering disaster relief spending, but not for investing in disaster preparedness spending. These inconsistencies distort the incentives of public officials, leading the government to underinvest in disaster preparedness, thereby causing substantial public welfare losses. We estimate that $1 spent on preparedness is worth about $15 in terms of the future damage it mitigates. By estimating both the determinants of policy decisions and the consequences of those policies, we provide more complete evidence about citizen competence and government accountability.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference87 articles.
1. Zaller John . 1999. A Theory of Media Politics. UCLA. Monograph.
2. Witt James L. 1998. “Project Impact: Building a Disaster Resistant Community.” Disaster Recovery Journal. January 30. www.drj.com/articles/Win98/witt.htm (July 23, 2009).
3. The Political Economy of Benefits and Costs: A Neoclassical Approach to Distributive Politics
4. Walters Jonathan , and Kettl Donald . 2005. “The Katrina Breakdown.” Governing December.
Cited by
512 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献