Abstract
It is typically assumed that African leaders enact policies that benefit their ethnoregional group using all types of patronage. Crop production and political power are geographically concentrated in many African countries, and this paper exploits this overlap to cast doubt on this conventional wisdom. It shows, using data on 50 country-crop combinations, that cash crop farmers who are ethnically identified with the head of state facehighertaxes. Furthermore, democratic regimes impose lower taxes. This paper shows that farmers who have few alternatives face higher taxes. African leaders have used local intermediaries to exert control over the countryside and to ensure that farmers do not support alternative candidates. It suggests that as leaders are better at selecting and monitoring these intermediaries in their home areas, they can extract more from the majority at home than abroad using taxes on cash crops, which are regionally but not individually targetable.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference62 articles.
1. Khemani Stuti .2003.“Partisan Politics and Intergovernmental Transfers in India.”Working Paper. World Bank.
2. Akiyama Takamasa , John Baffes , Donald F. Larson , and Panos Varangis .2003.“Commodity Market Reform in Africa: Some Recent Experience.”World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Paper 2995.
3. Decalo Samuel .1995.Historical Dictionary of Benin.3rd ed.Metuchen, NJ:Scarecrow Press.
4. Bates Robert H .1981.Markets and States in Tropical Africa: The political basis of agricultural policies.Berkeley:University of California Press.
5. Ichino Nahomi .2006.Thugs and Voters: Tournament Parties in Nigeria.Unpublished Manuscript.
Cited by
225 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献